DonateSearch

Allegheny County Council

Proposed ballot question would give council a say on contracts over $30,000.

Written by Amy Whipple

Come Election Day, residents may have the opportunity to change who has a say in Allegheny County’s contracts.

In the 26 years since Allegheny County transitioned from a commissioner-based system, the executive has had sole authority over contracts not involving property transactions.

Council Member Alex Rose of the South Side Slopes introduced legislation during the May 26 meeting to place a referendum on the Nov. 3 general election ballot to address that perceived imbalance. It would ask residents if the county code should be amended to require council to approve contracts over $30,000 except in emergency circumstances.

The proposal’s rationale says that putting “hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars within the sole discretion of a single individual is fiscally unwise, and invites at least the perception of a lack of transparency.”

The legislation also says the executive’s contractual commitments create tension with council, which is responsible for the annual budget.

Currently, council must be notified of new contracts prior to, or contemporaneous with, their execution. Rose’s legislation states that the requirement has never been systematically followed. Rather, council receives a report of the executive’s actions the previous month.

Council referred the legislation to the government reform committee.

Connections to this story

Topics:
Government & Accountability
Governments:
Allegheny County Council
Public meetings:
Allegheny County Council Regular Meeting · May 26, 2026
Sources:
Ordinance 13969-26 — directing that a referendum question regarding the repeal of Article V, §2(i) of the Home Rule Charter of Allegheny…

More surveys

Have your say on more of the stories we’re covering.

Allegheny County Council

Council president removal vote expected May 26.

Allegheny County Council is preparing to remove Member Pat Catena of Carnegie from the president’s seat because of a mailer sent by his campaign for state representative.